ESPN Comments On End of A&M/TTU Game
Tim Keown of espn.com wrote a story about the way to end a game.
And then, on Saturday, I watched the end of the Texas Tech-Texas A&M game. Tech was leading 36-25, A&M was out of timeouts and there was under a minute left. Sound familiar? The game's over, but Tech quarterback Graham Harrell is still in the game and Tech is still trying to score.
At this point, it bears mentioning that I consider Tech coach Mike Leach to be one of the most innovative minds in at least two generations of college football coaches. He doesn't see the game through a conventional lens, and that's as inspiring as it is rare.
However.
With 24 seconds left, Leach called for a replay-review on a play that he thought resulted in a touchdown. The review didn't agree, so Tech ran another play and Harrell ran into the end zone, ball held overhead, the taunting, conquering hero.
So Tech wins 43-25 and everybody who questions Leach publicly couches it by saying or writing, "That's just the way Leach is." Well, he shouldn't be that way. He's better than that. Being consistent is no excuse for being classless and inconsiderate. It's instructive to note the announcers on the game barely addressed the issue, either because they're afraid of alienating Leach and Tech or because we're so numb to displays of crappy sportsmanship that it didn't even occur to them.
I am conflicted on this issue.
Side A: When the result of the game has been decided, there is no reason to pile on.
Side B: Since when do teams pull up against conference opponents? Imagine if A&M's poll position was based on the score against an opponent. Would we want Sherman to poke it in at the end?... I think we might.
I think what I had a problem with in this situation was Graham Harrell.
Let me preface by saying, I've met Graham Harrell and had the chance to hang out with him at a bar in Lubbock just before the start of the 2007 season. He was very nice and he talked about how much he liked playing at Kyle Field. Harrell seemed like a real down to earth guy, almost shy.
I think there is nothing wrong with running your offense until the final gun, but if you do score on a team you have already put away, just toss the ball to the ref and head to the sideline. On the field, that shy Graham Harrell comes off as very arrogant; it is difficult to believe it is the same person.
Comments
Jarrett, you kind of echo what a lot of us Tech fans feel. It’s a tough spot to be in as a fan. Sure, you want to score a lot since it’s fun to cheer that sort of thing. But at the same time we, as fans, have to deal with the impressions the rest of the world has on the team and, via proxy, us as individuals. Sad, but true.
I too had a bitter taste at the end of the game. Maybe not as much as the TD, but the way Harrell acted. It was immature. But really, like you said, he has a TON of respect for aTm and thinks your fans and your stadium are among the coolest he’s been around. I have spoken to him twice in Lubbock and he is a quiet kid and almost seems embarrased by his success. I think the emotions of the game probably got to him at the end. Our senior class never lost to the Aggies and that’s a big deal to them. Still, it was a tough one for me as a Tech fan to watch.
I have never been a fan of the way Leach does some things, but he does them. I just wish we, as Red Raider fans, weren’t held accountable for the actions of a coach. It kind of sucks. I am also guessing that if you took aside the players on the team and guaranteed anonymity, they’d prefer we take a knee in situations like that.
by Tech92 on Oct 21, 2008 5:45 PM CDT 0 recs
Style Points dont count in the big picture
Especially when you are piling on. Getting that extra touchdown does nothing to get Tech in to any BCS bowl…only winning the rest of their games does. With atleast three top 10 ranked teams left on their schedule, that touchdown was pretty meaningless, alienated a lot of fans and on the whole gave a bad impression about the Tech team, IMHO.
by maroonblood on Oct 22, 2008 2:18 AM CDT 0 recs
Stewart - Love the mailbag. Regarding the issue of teams running up the score, why is it such a big deal and sore spot in college football (particularly College Station)? The game is 60 minutes long, so why are teams with decent leads supposed to give up? David Ray, Allen, Texas
-
I’m glad you brought this up, because it’s become a personal pet peeve lately. First you heard it after the Florida-Miami game, now after Texas Tech-Texas A&M. I even heard people accusing USC of doing it against Washington State, which is absurd. They let the clock run out at halftime with the ball at the opponent’s 12-yard line and threw one pass in the final 34 minutes. What were they supposed to do, take a knee the entire second half?
Why all the belly-aching, people? In a sport where everyone’s constantly talking about “toughness” and “pride,” doesn’t it seem a bit … for lack of a better word, “wussy,” to ask your opponent to take mercy on you at the end? It’s not like the losing team stops trying to score once the game’s out of hand.
I think the problem here is that somewhere over the years we muddled the true definition of “running up the score.” Once upon a time, coaches like Barry Switzer would “hang half a hundred” just because they could, or because they held a grudge against the opposing coach. You don’t see too much of that anymore. I suppose what Mike Leach did against Texas A&M could fall into that category, but he’s never hid from the fact that he doesn’t believe in calling off the dogs, regardless of the opponent. We never got an explanation from Urban Meyer about the end of the Miami game, but it was a rivalry game. What’s the fun of rubbing it in your rival’s face if you have to stop rubbing it into their face at a certain score? And what does it say about the state of Miami football that their fans have been relegated to whining about the other team scoring too much?
My only gripe is if a team that’s got a win in hand starts pulling out flea-flickers and such. That’s just showing somebody up. For the most part, however, I can’t say I blame coaches for trying to score as many points as possible. Take it from a pollster — style points do matter. Regrettably, a lot of times voters are going on little more than the final score when they fill out their ballot. They see that a team only won 24-14, not realizing that they were sitting on the 1-yard line with a chance to go up 31-14. And it works the other way too. If all you saw was that Texas beat Missouri 56-31, you might assume the ‘Horns’ defense wasn’t that great, when in truth Texas gave up 17 points before the Tigers scored two late TDs against second stringers.
by Tech92 on Oct 22, 2008 2:37 PM CDT 0 recs
Point 1: I long for the day that teams accuse us of piling on the score. Particularly after this game I hope the first team to whine about it is Tech.
Point 2: Tech, and its Classless Clown Coach only proved again that they are, and always will be, classless clowns. As if the goalpost incident were not enough proof, now this. I hope we shove this incident, and the goalpost incident, down their classless clown collective throats some day. They are simply lowlifes.
Is that clear?
by KeithDB on Oct 22, 2008 10:26 PM CDT 0 recs
good to have you back, Keith
why don’t you tell us how you really feel?
by Beergut on Oct 23, 2008 12:55 AM CDT 0 recs
?
Point 1: I long for the day that teams accuse us of piling on the score. Particularly after this game I hope the first team to whine about it is Tech.
By this, I take it that you condone running up the score? If so, why are you whining about it so much? a&m is just as guilty as anyone…see 1986.
Oh, and name-calling isn’t the “classiest” thing a person can do.
by pcrawttu on Oct 23, 2008 2:57 PM CDT 0 recs
Style Points Count
End of story. Tech is playing for a BCS Bowl this year, if not a championship. Style points count for them. This is something everyone overlooks now. Sportsmanship when playing for a title means trying to score as much as possible, and every team knows that. If tech was 4-3 maybe you have a case, but this is also a rivalry game for them (not us, I refuse to have a rivalry with a Tier 3 school, no matter how often they beat us. I just don’t care as much as I do about OU, Texas), so it’s understandable.
I would hope our team would do the same thing to them at the end of a game if we’re in the national title/BCS bowl picture. But not if we’re 4-3. After all, you only do that to a team you consider a rival.
Meat? They're made out of Meat? Meat.
by ihavethemelody on Oct 23, 2008 9:21 PM CDT 0 recs
pcfawttu, you did not contest the accuracy of the labels I ascribe. I suspect there is a reason for that.
by KeithDB on Oct 23, 2008 10:06 PM CDT 0 recs










