I Am The 12th Man: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cowboy Altitude for Wyoming Fans!

Do We Need A Big 12 Network?

You know, when I first heard about the Big Ten Network, I was one of the skeptics. Who the hell would want to watch women's field hockey on a cable channel? That was my main question. I didn't think there was a market at all for the non-revenue sports that can't even sellout their games, forget garner television time.

Well, it turns out I may have been partially correct. There probably aren't that many people (outside of parents and friends) who watch women's field hockey on the Big Ten Network, but that isn't the genius of this network. No, the genius of the Big Ten Network is that it gives them a platform to show Big Ten football games all through the Fall. While any games not picked up for broadcast are shown live on the BTN on Saturdays, the real joy comes on the other six days of the week, when they can show replays. College football fans like me who are starved to watch football, any football, can tune in and watch replays of Ohio State-Penn State or Michigan-Minnesota or any other conference or non-conference games played in the previous week. The nice thing is that after reading about a competitive Big Ten game in the Sunday morning paper, I can tune in later that week and watch the game for myself. This is especially helpful when you're debating fans on another blog about how competitive their conference or team is. The football coverage alone makes the Big Ten Network worth watching. The commercials running 24/7/365 marketing the schools inbetween the games and coaches shows is just gravy.

So, this brings me to my question: Should the Big 12 Conference form their own television network? Obviously, there are many positives to consider. Our own television network could ensure that every single non-conference and conference football game that is not televised because it wasn't picked by ABC/ESPN/FSSW/VS that week will still be shown. Our own network means we can showcase men's and women's basketball games. It means we can give this conference the attention it deserves when college baseball season rolls around.

Flipping through the channels, I see that the Mountain West Conference has their own network. I see that Brigham Young University has their own channel on which they occasionally show games. Reading the news, I see that texas is trying to reach a deal where they will secure their own sports channel. It seems to me that the Big 12 Conference needs to step it up and take advantage of this opportunity. The advantages in marketing and extra exposure we could get by showing all of the football and basketball games not picked up by the conference's contracted sports networks makes having our own conference network worth it. We could locate the network offices in Dallas, along with the conference home office. We could show all conference baseball, softball, and soccer games not already scheduled for television. I really don't see how we would lose on this proposition. I have officially become a convert.

 

Poll
Should the Big 12 Conference start their own television network?
Yes
21 votes
No
1 votes
I need to study this issue more.
0 votes

22 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 5 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

The Big 12

should definitely start their own network. It will allow them to best compete with the SEC on a national scale. Having all of their games televised will be a plus, and I would LOVE to be able to watch all the A&M basketball games. It’s the sports like basketball/baseball/track that would really benefit, not to mention recruiting. Letting a kid know that his parents will be able to watch almost every one of his games/events? Worth a lot.

Meat? They're made out of Meat? Meat.

by ihavethemelody on Nov 13, 2008 11:23 PM CST reply actions  

bring it on!

good insight, beergut

I am like you, I was a skeptic at first.

by jarrett.adams on Nov 14, 2008 7:24 AM CST reply actions  

Anything that would permit me...

…to watch any and every K-State sporting event is good by me.

My question regards what would happen to the conference’s football revenue-sharing plan if this happens. As it stands now, half the TV contract money is divided equally, and half is allocated based on TV appearances. If every game for every school is on TV, how do you divide that other half? Maybe you just do away with the unequal revenue sharing, although I’m certain the administration at UT, TAMU, OU and NU are not going to be in favor of that. Or maybe only games that are played on ABC/ESPN/FSN/VS count toward the revenue sharing.

We'll carry the banner high!
Bring On The Cats

by TB on Nov 14, 2008 9:53 AM CST reply actions  

you keep the same system

I think if we created a network before all of our current television contracts run out, you keep the same revenue sharing model you have now.

Since all non-televised games will now be shown on the Big 12 Network, any and all revenues derived from those games is divided up equally.

by Beergut on Nov 14, 2008 12:33 PM CST up reply actions  

only games that are played on ABC/ESPN/FSN/VS count toward the revenue sharing

IMO, thats the anlge you go for.

by jarrett.adams on Nov 14, 2008 11:00 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Texas A&M Aggies.
Start posting about the Aggies »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Eyeofthetiger_small
*****Calling Animal Lovers and Sports Fans Alike
Iphone_017_small
Week 1 locks?
01_beat_la_small
What the hell is Dennis Dodd smoking, and where can I buy some?
Small
Big 12 football: Texas A&M expects to be a player in Big 12 South standings
Dsc00750_small
Missed Opportunity
Iphone_017_small
UGA fans screw up CU ticket plans
Small
Does anybody have a good video of the entire team entrance?
01_beat_la_small
USA Today Preseason Coaches Poll Out Today
H713_small
NCAA Football 11
Small
Steve Kragthorpe Stepping Down

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Utah running back Eddie Wide (36) works to break free from Pittsburgh's Max Gruder (55) and Jarred Holley (18) during the first half of an NCAA college football game Thursday, Sept. 2, 2010, in Salt Lake City. (AP Photo/Steve C. Wilson)

Utah Upsets No. 15 Pittsburgh In Opening Night Overtime Thriller, 27-24

HONOLULU - SEPTEMBER 2:  Ronald Johnson #83 of the University of Southern California Trojans runs in for a touchdown against Corey Nielsen #8 of the University of Hawaii Warriors during first half action at Aloha Stadium September 2 2010 in Honolulu Hawaii. (Photo by Kent Nishimura/Getty Images) +2 updates

Lane Kiffin Is Victorious In Debut, No. 14 USC Wins In A Shootout At Hawaii, 49-36

South Carolina quarterback Stephen Garcia, left, celebrates a first-quarter touchdown with South Carolina tackle Kyle Nunn, center, and South Carolina guard Rokevious Watkins, right, during the first half of their NCAA college football game against Southern Mississippi, Thursday, Sept. 2, 2010, at Williams-Brice Stadium, in Columbia, S.C.  (AP Photo/Brett Flashnick) link

South Carolina Rolls Over Southern Miss, Wins 41-13

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Av-7_small Beergut

Editors

Iphone_017_small miketag

2008_0913summer20080014_small wishiwasalonghorn

Banner_small MTAggie