Arkansas Postmortem
I thought we'd take one last look back at this game, and then we'll move on to our upcoming game against Oklahoma State. We knew this season would be one of growth, and we hope to see improvement week to week. I think we've seen that this season so far, but I do think we took a step back against Arkansas, in that we know that our lines still aren't where they need to be.
I felt sorry for Stephen Barerra, because they kept highlighting him on television when he got beaten on the edge, which was too often. However, he is a true freshman who was still playing against high school kids at this time last year. He is going to take some lumps this year, but hopefully it will translate to better play down the line this season and in the future. He has a bright future ahead of him.
We only had two sacks of Ryan Mallett the whole game, one by Von Miller and another by Matt Featherston. Both took polace int eh first quarter, when we were in the process of building a 10-0 lead while sending their offense to three straight three-and-outs. After that, it didn't seem like we got all that much pressure on Mallett. I'd really like to see us use Featherston on the strongside and Miller on the weakside, so we can get two of our better pass rushers on the field at the same time, especially on third-and-long situations. I know Featherston is Miller's backup at the Jack position, but I think against the spread offenses we'll face this season, getting as much speed off the edge is imperative. I'll need to watch the DVD to break down what we did for our pass rush, but I was really hoping Joe Kines would show a mix of stunts, twists, and blitzes to get pressure on Mallett on every play. It is apparent that if we did mix it up, they were able to pick it up, because we didn't bring the heat often enough.
Offensively, I really thought we needed to go to our play-action game more often, especially after the fumble-return-for-a-TD appeared to shake Jerrod's confidence for a bit. A play-action fake off zone-read action to a wide receiver screen is a simple, high percentage play that would have allowed Jerrod to regain his compsure as he completed some more passes and got back into a rhythm. I also think we need to rollout Jerrod more often, and have the TB follow him outside. This gives him a run/pass/pitch option to threaten the edge of the defense, and would take some pressure off the offensive line. With Jerrod threatening the edge every play, the defense would have to send their LBs on outside contain, which means fewer people would be dedicated to the rush. It also means DEs wouldn't be able to pin their ears back and go upfield on every single snap.
Jerrod Johnson ended up 30-58 on the night, passing for 345 yards and two TDs. Statistically, that isn't a bad night, but many of those completions and one TD came after the disastrous first half, when we were down by three scores. Jerrod needs to learn to shake off a mistake, and keep playing. After the sack and fumble return for TD, Jerrod threw six straight incompletions, and while some of that was a result of playcalling (see above about calling short, safe passes to get easy completions) and Arkansas did bring some pressure, Jerrod was clearly flustered. We're going to need him to lead us this season, so he needs to get better at handling a setback. This isn't Austin, the coaches won't give him a PB&J sandwich, hold his hand, and excuse his poor play by saying he has the flu; he needs to step up.
Jerrod did spread the ball around to 8 different receivers, and the passing game netted 345 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions; that is a good night through the air. We ran the ball 35 times for 113 yds, an average of 3.2 yards per carry. three yards a carry is a poor performance any way you look at it. I also found some of Cromwell's decisions on when to run the ball inexplicable, like on 3rd and 26 in the first quarter. Really? I also didn't like the end-around call to Uzoma Nwachukwu; Arkansas had speed on the edge, we had run the play before, and they were obviously ready for it. It was a play that took too long to develop, and I tohught it was just a poor playcall, especially at that point in the game.
We left this game knowing out offense can move the ball; we just need to get better at moving it into the endzone. Now, we need to begin getting ready for an Oklahoma State team that had a bye week, so they'll have two weeks to get ready to play us.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
x
I feel like the whole game changed after the Tannehill incompletion/drop. That seemed to be a killer.
I dunno
the offensive pass interference call on 3rd and 12 on Morrow (which I really question, btw) and then the draw play on 3rd and 27 really pissed me off
Morrow had two pass interference calls in the game that I remember (one before the Tannehill drop, iirc), and I wonder why we get called for PI so often, and other teams don’t.
I watched this game with several aggie friends and we all agreed on several basic points about this year’s offense:
1. Without Fuller, the WRs are good, not great.
2. JJ is a good passer, but is prone to inconsistency/bouts of lack of confidence.
3. The RBs are young but talented, more than capable of multiple big plays per game.
4. The O-line is young, inexperienced and prone to disastrous miscues.
Given this, we all came to a similar conclusion to what you posted above, namely that JJ should be passing from the pocket less and be moved around much more. This would greater utilize the skill/speed at RB and minimize the O-line’s weaknesses. JJ can run and the WRs/RBs are more likely to make plays when DBs and LBs get caught in a moment of indecisiveness when JJ rolls out with a RB or two in tow.
A&M’s offense is not Tech’s or UH’s. Passing 58 times a game is probably not a recipe for consistent success, especially with a porous O-line. Then again, it hasn’t really worked too well for UH or Tech this season either.
Granted, this was an armchair analysis from 3 half drunk aggie grads and one 3/4 drunk UT grad and not a nuanced breakdown of technique and situational play calling by any means.
This isn’t Austin, the coaches won’t give him a PB&J sandwich, hold his hand, and excuse his poor play by saying he has the flu; he needs to step up.
For the record, McCoy went 15 for 18 in the second half and got the ‘W’ after his PB&J’s. Maybe JJ should have had a sammy or two.
"It's not that the Irish are cynical. It's rather that they have a wonderful lack of respect for everything and everybody."
-- Brendan Behan --
Passing
I think that some of Johnson’s inconsistency was caused by the porous O-line. Arkansas was in his face too much. The receivers’ inability to get open probably didn’t help, either. Not sure that going to the ground is the answer however given 3 yards/play average rush – again, a factor of a porous O-line and young RB’s. All in all, this is going to be a long year for A&M, but certainly an improvement from last year.
Its hard to blame JJ
when you have a defender in your face nearly every snap. I felt like I was watching a game from last season with all that penetration our O-line was giving up. The only good I can take out of the performance is we are young and there is great potential to improve. But the game this weekend could turn real ugly if we play like we did last Saturday.

by 













