A Real Throwback Game Would Be Nice
It has become popular for college teams to wear "throwback" uniforms in one game a year, often to commemorate an anniversary of some type. It may be an anniversary of a certain game, a certain season, or a certain event. There even rumors that Nebraska will don "throwback" uniforms this season to celebrate their 300th consecutive home sellout this season. I think teams need to go further, though, in their efforts, and not just wear uniforms harking to an earlier time, but also play like it.
I think teams should agree to a true "throwback game" where both squads agree to run an old offensive and defensive scheme for that game. The offense would have to be a true throwback scheme, something run before the 1950s, and the defense would be from that same era. I think such a game would have to be a non-conference game, and probably the first game of the season, because you wouldn't want to be practicing either scheme after the conference season begins.I do think having such a true "throwback game" would be a huge boon to the fans, the players, and the coaches.
The fans would get the opportunity to see an offensive scheme that was used in years past, so they can witness some of the history of the game. I think it would be plain old fun for the fans, and it would ignite conversation on the game's history; it would allow older fan to share their knowledge of the game with younger fans. I think it would be fun for the players because besides gaining the opportunity to play in a scheme their grandparents ran, it will let them test their athletic abilities. Imagine Robert Griffin running the single-wing offense, or Tim Tebow running the fullhouse-T. It would also force some players to work harder on skills they may not perfect in their current scheme; a wide receiver in the spread has to block, but he doesn't have to be as efficient a blocker as an End in the single-wing.
Imagine Robert Griffin in the single-wing offense
The change in schemes would also challenge defensive players. Can you imagine some of the LBs of today trying to play in a wide-tackle six defense? They would have to drill harder on getting off blocks and work more in pass coverage, because they would be more exposed to offensive linemen, and would cover a larger area in pass coverage.
Running a throwback scheme would also benefit the coaching staff, because after their throwback game, the coaches would have those offensive series in their back pocket, to be pulled out whenever they need it. Every team they faced for the rest of the season would have to spend time in practice working on stopping that particular scheme, just in case.
It would take a lot of work to set a game like this up, and the teams would have to agree to run ONLY plays from that offensive scheme or defensive scheme, but I think it could work. The mystery of not knowing what offense or defense you would see when you stepped out on the field would make it fun for the players, and would force the coaches to have to scheme and adjust on the fly. I think such a throwback game would also be an attractive way to market and sell tickets to a game some fans might not originally plan on attending, because a chance to see your team do something you won't see any other time that season will be too much for osme fans to pass up. Schools could even sweeten the deal by using throwback prices for that one game, but that is probably asking too much for some athletic departments.
0 recs |
8 comments
|
Comments
I think
you’re assuming that the majority of fans are true fans of the game and appreciate it and understand it the way you do. I think 50% of the people in Kyle would be bored if they saw something like this. Because well, that’s about how many people in the stands today don’t understand what’s happening on the field and they have no basis to appreciate a throwback game.
I had someone bring up the issue of fan appreciation
They said too many fans treat the game like a social event and excuse to get drunk rather than a sport. While those fans may not appreciate what they are seeing, I do think the other fans who really get into the game would love it.
I think if it was a situation where we did this at Kyle, a lot of fans would really get into it, especially if we ran the single-wing, and were running the ball just about every play. Aggies love a tough running game.
Imagine if they ran the single-wing again for a whole game at Tennessee, where General Neyland’s name is on the stadium? They’d go nuts for it. In the SEC, it would also help other teams, b/c it is what they face once a year when they play Florida.
I also think the media would get a kick out of it, and it would end up giving your program lots of free publicity.
I was in the stands
for the Fran era where we only ran the ball, no one, absolutely no one on the student side wants to see a run heavy offense. And trust me, maybe, maybe 30 percent of the fans know what’s going on and like I said earlier 50 percent are into it and the other 50 are there because they are supposed to be. And yes that adds up to more than 100, but that 30 is in the first 50.
Basically I’m saying your idea is a great idea, but nothing more than that, an idea. Practically it doesn’t work and you even started to address that in your article.
by the12thman11 on Jul 21, 2009 6:44 PM CDT up reply actions
You are joking right?
I’m sorry, but that is a stupid idea. If you want to do it in an exhibition or spring practice go ahead. But to do it in a regular season game is dumb and not even wishful thinking, but a sign that you have to much time on your hands. Wow, what an embarrassing post.
There was a firefight!!!!
I'm sorry
but what are season-opening games like Oklahoma-Tennessee-Chattanooga but a glorified scrimmage or exhibition? This is the type of game I am proposing this idea for.
He apparently
has removed several posts and not just yours. He also removed anything supporting you. And he hasn’t given an explanation for banning you. I think he’s worried that he’ll lose most of his readership if he says why he actually banned you, since it doesn’t seem to be for a legitimate reason.
the posts aren't removed, they are just hidden
if you want to know why jarrett was banned, email me
This isn’t sports-related, so I’m not going to air it out on the blog.

by 















