Not A Single Aggie Nominated To Media Preseason All-Big 12 Football Team
The 2009 Media Preseason All-Big 12 Football Team was announced Friday, and not a single Aggie was voted onto the team. I wish I could take their predicted all-conference team seriously, but the inclusion of several players gives me pause. The most glaring mistake is the inclusion of Brandon Carter of Texas Tech on the offensive line. Do you know who Brandon Carter is? If you were paying any attention to college football at all last season, you know who he is; he was the clown in the make-up wearing a Texas Tech uniform last season. (He was also known for unintentionally mooning a national television audience during the Oklahoma game last season; see video after the jump.) Television cameras loved to focus on him whenever Tech was playing, because he was definitely photogenic. The problem is, this offensive guard who used facepaint and various mohawk hairdos to attract attention to a normally faceless position (and to his credit, succeeded in that endeavor) is not an exceptional player, certainly not one who deserves all-conference recognition. In fact, I would go so far as to say that Carter is lacking as very lacking as a guard; at 6'7, 354 lbs, Carter has prototypical tackle size, but lacks skill and ability, so they moved him inside to offensive guard, where he is just mediocre. The media loves him because of his Dennis Rodmanesque attempts to get their attention, but they are forgetting one important fact: Rodman actually had some talent, and could play his position exceptionally well. Carter is attention-seeking behavior and facepaint masking an ordinary talent.
The next player nomination I question is that of Sergio Kindle on the defensive line. Kindle was a strongside LB last season who is going to be moved into more of a OLB/DE hybrid position this season, which really means he'll be a DE. While I'm sure putting him on the line will give texas more speed on the edge of their defense, I don't see how this automatically makes him an all-conference selection. Last season, texas had Brian Orakpo and Henry Melton on the edges to occupy blockers, as well as Roy Miller and Aaron Lewis inside; offensive linemen who wanted to block Kindle already had their hands full with Orakpo and Miller, so he was free to roam and make plays. Even if they lined up Kindle on the line next to Melton or opposite Orakpo (which they did often, witness OU highlights here), you are still looking at a situation of people running away from Orakpo and running into Kindle. Kindle won't have that kind of protection this season, and with texas breaking in a new defensive tackle rotation, you can be sure Kindle will get the full attention of opposing linemen now that he is down on the line with his hand on the ground. Kindle looks to be starting at the weakside DE position this season, so he will be facing the opposition's LT on the vast majority of his plays. We'll see how he does getting off blocks against the opposition's best. I think Will Muschamp is a stellar defensive coordinator, and I think he is going to get as much out of Kindle as he possibly can this season, but I think Kindle's stats will still see a drop-off from last season.
The other player nominations that don't make sense to me is the defensive backfield. I understand the nomination of Dominique Franks for one cornerback spot, but the other three nominations (Thomas, Lake, and Stuckey) are all safeties. If the media is going to put together an all-conference team with more than two safeties, how the hell can they exclude Trent Hunter? Earl Thomas would be running second-string if he played at A&M, but the media has predicted he will be an all-conference player. Perrish Cox is good enough to be nominated to the team as a KR, but is so unimpressive as a CB, the media would rather include a third safety? I don't understand that line of thinking.
I also think putting Adam Ulatoski on the team as an OL when you already have a stud at LT in Russell Okung is redundant, but I don't confess to understand the media's logic when picking the offensive line. I think they pick the linemen who receive the most hype (Ulatoski) or make for the best story (Carter) instead of actually evaluating how they play.
Brandon Carter and Adam Ulatoski on the offensive line, Sergio Kindle on the DL, and three safeties in the defensive backfield make it impossible for me to take this list seriously. Hopefully, after the season is over, and the coach's all-conference team is announced, A&M will have performed well enought o have several players recognized on the all-conference team that matters.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’d be happier with your big 12 all conference rankings, having only 1 all conference player on a team that is set to contend for the national championship is certainly impressive. and earl thomas would be a 2nd stringer for A&M? really? really??
by Displaced Longhorn on Jul 26, 2009 7:41 AM CDT reply actions
We will see If they contend for the national title or not. Like I said, I like Hall. Kindle is there because he had 10 sacks last year so I can understand that. Tech’s linemen are always hard to judge to me. They so seem to excell
At not getting called for holding. Hard to concentrate on them when there is so much going on anyways.
by miketag on Jul 26, 2009 12:05 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
This is the same
secondary that gave up 49 points to Texas and 66 points to Oklahoma, and you think he would be a backup? Don’t really see that.
texas' secondary was worst last season than A&M's secondary
if you can’t see that, you weren’t watching the games
You're right
I didn’t watch the A&M games after losing to Arkansas State.
You don’t suppose that because Texas had one of the best run defense in the nation that had any correlation to teams being forced to throw more. And the fact that teams could do whatever they wanted against A&M. I can still see Cody Johnson running.
if you didn't watch A&M play
why are you in this discussion?
Actually, having a stellar run defense should mean the opposite; you have forced a team to be one-dimensional, so you should be able to tee off on their passing game. With Miller and Orakpo, y’all had the pass rush to get pressure on opposing QBs, so your pass defense should have been a lot better. The fact that y’all gave up the yards you did with the pass rush you had means your secondary is the problem.
I don’t know why texas fans have such a problem admitting this; the texas secondary has been crap for the last three seasons in a row, you’d think you’d be used to it by now.
Hahahahahahaha
“Earl Thomas would be running second-string if he played at A&M”
That’s a joke right? Because A&M’s secondary is clearly superior to UT’s.
texas’ pass defense 2008: #104 in the nation
A&M’s pass defense 2008: #95 in the nation
You were saying……
a whole 15yd/g…. clearly the superior secondary.
it’s been known since week 1 that Texas was playing a bend don’t break defense allowing tons of yards, but not a ton of points.
Scoring Defense
A&M : #115
Texas : #18
Passes Defended per Game
A&M : #96
Texas : #14
Passes Broken Up
A&M : #93
Texas : #3
Interceptions
A&M : #99
Texas : #114
Yeah, we’re just saying…
by Displaced Longhorn on Jul 26, 2009 7:04 PM CDT up reply actions
What is the difference between passes defended and passes broken up? Bend but don’t break? I’d fire the defensive coordinator for that
by miketag on Jul 26, 2009 8:07 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
passes defended include both broken up pass as well as interceptions, broken up are balls that’re deflected by the defender.
yeah, it’s a defensive philosophy. instead of letting the defenders get behind you and make the big plays (one of Texas biggest problems previously), you play with a cushion and allow them the cushion to move the ball and getting the stop, not necessarily with a 3 and out, but at some point before the goal line… and the massive amount of yardage in conjunction with the low scoring reflects that philosophy. when we had double coverage on dez bryant all night because he’s a homerun threat the entire game, their rb’s picked up a ton of yards but we couldn’t bring up a safety to stuff the run because they’re too busy keeping dez bryant in front of them 30yds downfield.
yeah, you go ahead and fire will muschamp because he kept the opponents from scoring while giving up yards and making the Texas defense statistically similar in one facet to the bottom of the barrel defenses such as…. A&M. fuckin 37pt/g, whata joke.
by Displaced Longhorn on Jul 26, 2009 8:24 PM CDT up reply actions
I’d be willing to bet money that coach boom m’fer would not call the defense bend but don’t break. Reality is that you blitzes all the time last year. You attacked, it’s just that your coverage was poor. It has been that way at tu for the past 3 years. Rationalize it all you want. I’m not saying that the A&M defense was anything to write home about because they sucked last year. I’m just talking about the tu secondary which was very poor despite one of the top pass rushes in the nation. You would expect them to improve this year with guys like Gideon getting more experience. I will have to see it before I believe it though.
by miketag on Jul 27, 2009 7:44 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
you’d fire your entire coaching staff to have our broken defense and worthless DC
by Displaced Longhorn on Jul 27, 2009 4:33 AM CDT up reply actions
story about Joe Kines from a bama fan…
I was working this past Sunday night at Olive Garden in Tuscaloosa and as i was walking around the restaurant and i heard a voice that i recognized and looked over at one of the tables and it was Joe Kines and his wife. I said either im crazy or you look and sound just like Joe Kines. He said yea thats me and shook my hand. We started talking and i asked him how the season was going at Texas A&M and he simply said without even hesitating “We are not very good.” I wanted to start laughing but i couldnt do that in front of him.
by Displaced Longhorn on Jul 27, 2009 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions
Not very good is certainly better than down-right awful. Small improvement is important to teams (and people) trying to crawl from the gutter.
A&M is in one of the richest football talented areas, they won’t stay down for too long.
by Displaced Longhorn on Jul 27, 2009 7:09 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm assuming this story was from last season?
One of the reasons I like Kines in his honesty. He came out as the season ended and said Sherman had every right to fire him, b/c his defense didn’t do a good job. That kind of honesty and personal accountability is sorely lacking in college football, and it was especially lacking during the Fran era. I want a person like Kines teaching college kids as long as he is able to.
I don’t know for sure, but I could have sworn it was posted this summer. yeah, it was posted in July, though the author didn’t say when it happened other than “this past Sunday” so I assumed it was recent.
by Displaced Longhorn on Jul 28, 2009 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions
another passing stat
Passing Efficiency Defense
A&M : #108
Texas : #59
Oklahoma was the best in the pass happy Big12 at #46
by Displaced Longhorn on Jul 27, 2009 7:38 PM CDT up reply actions
I know
People who went to tech and they used to laugh at Carter because he wore the paint and mohawk when he was keeping the bench warm all game. I’m sorry I just don’t see how anyone can take him with the ridiculous eye black seriously
by the12thman11 on Jul 26, 2009 7:01 PM CDT via mobile reply actions

by 











