Aggies To Begin SEC Play In 2012
Following the 2011-2012 school year, Texas A&M will change athletic conferences, and officially become a member of the Southeastern Conference. The Aggies will be joined by texas university, University of Oklahoma, and Oklahoma State University in their move to the SEC, making the SEC the first official 16-team superconference. Which programs will be moved to the SEC East and SEC West to create competitive balance in those two divisions is a discussion for another time. The key element to all of this move is television rights.
The future television contract the Zombie10 committed to with Dan Beebe on Tuesday doesn't take effect until after the 2011-'12 season is over, which is when Fox Sports Net's current agreement with the Big 12 ends. The Fox Sports Net contract is the key to everything, because under our current contract with ESPN/ABC, ESPN gets first choice to 18 conference football games every year; after ESPN makes their selections, FSN owns the rights to ALL remaining conference football games. FSN will sometimes sublicense those games to ESPN to show on their network of channels, or to Versus so they can show them. Once this contract ends, so does FSN's ownership of all Big 12 games not owned by ESPN, which is key because ESPN/ABC carry most of the SEC telecasts, along with CBS. Texas A&M, Oklahoma, texas, and OSU can move to the SEC, and expect ESPN to renegotiate the $2.25 billion deal they just signed in 2008.
The new deal for an FSN extension to begin after the 2011-'12 season isn't worth the breath that was wasted at the press conferences to address it. As part of the extension, all Big 12 schools will give up their third-tier TV rights, which means any football, basketball, baseball, et al. games not shown by ESPN or FSN. These third-tier TV rights are part of what make up the backbone of conference television networks, and is exactly what texas didn't want to give up to form a Big 12 television network. These third-tier TV rights are also what texas used as part of a poison pill to kill the Pac-16 deal when they realized they had other options, and didn't want to go there anymore. texas isn't willing to give up their third-tier TV rights now, and they aren't going to be willing to give them up in 2012 either. Once A&M, texas, OU, and OSU move to the SEC, though, they'll be able to sell these third-tier television rights to local television stations to increase their television revenue, something SEC schools already do. Arkansas made over $6 million last year off their third-tier TV rights, and I believe Georgia made over $10 million, so the ability to sell these rights, combined with the SEC's already lucrative television contract, means television revenue in the SEC dwarfs every other conference, including the Big Ten.
In the SEC, texas would be able to set up its own television network, something Oklahoma is already interested in doing, and something A&M has already begun doing. A&M broadcasts their third-tier TV television on Aggies All-Access online through CBS Sports (see another SEC connection here?), and is actually the best situated of all Big 12 schools to start their own network, it just isn't financially feasible at this time. With third-tier TV in the SEC including football games against other SEC schools, it will become more financially feasible.
The Zombie10 commitment the remaining Big 12 schools made this week is really just a space-filler; texas is tryng to distance itself from comments it made earlier about them not being an academic fit for the SEC, and the two years between now and the end of the FSN contract will give them that time. texas was looking at joining the Pac-10 because their athletic department saw the potential of a conference television network that combined television markets in California, Washington, and Oregon with television markets in Texas. However, the move by A&M to join the SEC threw a monkey wrench into that plan, though; A&M's move and the dissatisfaction of a contingent of the texas fanbase that didn't want to travel to Pullman, WA or Corvallis, OR to watch their team play at 9:30 PM CT for a primetime game blindsided the texas athletic department. This caused texas to to re-evaluate their options, and they ultimately decided to accept the Zombie10 deal, and give themselves time to work themselves back into the SEC. The two years between now and when the FSN deal expires also gives them plenty of time to try to get their sports network up and running, so they'll be able to reap the benefits of their third-tier TV rights when they enter the SEC.
The unfortunate part of the past two weeks has been A&M's leadership and their complete lack of vision; I'm sure they don't foresee that we're going to be in the SEC in two years anyway, and joining now would give us a two year head start in recruiting, so we could hit the ground running in football, ready to compete immediately in the conference. Joining the SEC now would also give us a two-year advantage on texas in recruiting, because we would know where we're going, and be able to differentiate ourselves from texas in recruiting. We would be the program headed to the best football conference in the nation, while texas would be headed to the Pac-10. I would have loved to see texas try to sell recruits on joining the Pac-10 while we'd be selling the SEC. Unfortunately, we're both going to be joining the SEC together in 2013, and we'll both be selling the same opportunity to recruits, so we've lost any potential advantage we would have had, all because we have imbeciles at the highest levels of the A&M administration.
A&M will begin SEC competition in 2013; you heard it here first.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
it's speculation
though reasonable speculation. I’m guessing Texas doesn’t move from their “we don’t want the SEC” stance, but I could certainly be wrong.
You got me
Did not read the last paragraphs very well at first. But, man you had me going at the beginning. LSU fan who remembers the late 80’s and early 90’s games with you. Harvey Williams, Todd Kinchen long kick off return, The Wrecking Crew defenses. Good games; hope you join up soon. Just got your re-post now. Man I hope you’re right.
So, is this how it's going to be going forward?
I know it’s hard to put a strained relationship back together again, but I think we should all focus on the positives here. Although the SEC would, I’m sure, have been lucrative for A&M, I am happy that the powers-that-be are keeping the big Texas football schools together. It’s not revenue-maximizing — and this remains to be seen, even for UT — but I think it’s good for our state, for tradition, and for what some people call flyover country. While we have the Big XII, I’d like to see everyone at least stay positive about it, play hard, enjoy the competition against old rivals and neighbors, and go make a bigger pile of money some other day. (I know, ISU isn’t exactly an old rival, but they’re good people, and where’re they gonna go anyway once your SEC dreams come true?)
[Disclaimer: UT fan and grad, long-time reader of this and other fine SB Nation blogs, only recently signed up. Can’t believe this is the first thing I’ve ever felt the need to comment on.]
That he was not a god, he knew; but he was at least a man.
Even for UT?
Up until this supposed tv deal which will supposedly put A&M and Oklahoma in the same ballpark financially with Texas with the other schools still far behind-maybe not light years anymore, and since A&M and Oklahoma had to come up in salary as reported by Beebe to come close to Texas-Texas still gets more right, Texas has had a lot more money, and a lot more top recruits starting from probably the beginning of The Big 12 which equals power. The power they used to push and persuade during the crises. As far as the top recruits gap from The ESPN college football recruiting website starting in 2006 and leading up to the verbal commitments in 2011 for top 150 players: Texas has gotten 59(56 from Texas), Okl. has gotten 34(17 from Texas), Okl. St. has gotten 7, Missouri 3, Colorado 5, Nebraska 4, Kan. St. 1, Baylor 3, Texas Tech 0-this is a school from Texas mind you-, Kansas 0, Iowa St. 0-those good easy win you mentioned. Texas A&M got 10 total with 0 verbals up to date for 2011. Up against these stats you have done very well as well as standing up when the rest laid down improving your finances maybe. Oklahoma should thank you, although with their recruiting numbers they did not need it. You are a big university near in Texas and you should get more top recruits from Texas than Oklahoma. As far as statistics going back further than 2006, The ESPN site will not allow you to go back further, but at least back to 2000, I bet the numbers will look very similar to the above. I would say the odds even in Vegas would be favorable for Texas. The powers-that-be are trying to keep the one big school’s elite status-has weakened some though. I hope you’re headline comes true as I said the LSU vs. A&M games I remember were special.
Corrections
You are a big university in Texas and you should get more top recruits from Texas than Oklahoma. (last sentence) I hope the headline from the Beergut article come true as I said the LSU vs. A&M games I remeber were special. Sorry about that.
And BTW I know this is BS. Why are allowed a website on the comparable level of Seth at DoubleTNation?
OK, it isn’t equal – MANY more people go there. From a smaller school.
Beergut - put it in your post that it is a prediction
One of us dummies at DoubleTNation took it as a fact, and I had to explain that it is a prediction. Seth doesn’t present his predictions as fact, so a guy got confused, thinking you were on Seth’s level regarding reporting.. I’m sure he’s straightened out now. BTW I still come here and read you, so it isn’t like I think you suck!:) I’m just asking for you to note that it is a prediction somewhere in the post.
Quite frankly I doubt he read your article. He probably just read the headline
I’ll stop now. Like I said, I bet he gets it now. With all of the activity of the last two weeks, I bet a lot of people are new to SBNation/blogs like these and don’t quite yet understand them.
is actually the best situated of all Big 12 schools to start their own network, it just isn’t financially feasible at this time.
lol how do you figure? Texas is looking to have their network up in 2 years, will A&M’s AD even be out of debt by then? I guess with the saving of the Big12-2 you might be able to pay it off with your winnings from the little 5.
by Displaced Longhorn on Jun 18, 2010 2:29 PM CDT reply actions
texas has been looking to have their network up for the last 14 years
it still hasn’t happened yet
As for how we’re the best situated, from what I’ve read, we have the most components in place to go forward with a network, it just doesn’t make sense to do it from a financial standpoint at this time. Everything I have read about texas’ proposed network says it will take three years just for them to get it profitable, which is probably why they haven’t done anything on it yet.
DO NOT WANT!!!
What you're seeing is team spirit. It's like the Holy Spirit, but more powerful.
-Hank Hill
Oh, so that's why "your friends in the State capital" kept the Zombie 10 together?
To buy time to distance ourselves from comments regarding the SEC’s paltry academics? Do you even read the shit you are writing?
Two teams can play each other head-to-head, and sportswriters still have to vote who they think is better.
by Longhorn_Seminole on Jun 18, 2010 10:28 PM CDT reply actions
I don't call y'all "our friends in the State capital"
that is bullshit coming from one of our resident idiots, $Bill
If texas really cared about academics, they wouldn’t be in a conference with Oklahoma State, Kansas State, or Texas Tech. You ever stop the smell the shit your athletic department feeds you, or do you just eat up?
Academics Indeed!
As previously constituted, the BIG XII had 1 more AAU school but 1 more Tier-3 school than the SEC. Moreover if you ranked all 12 schools within each conference, the academic rankings of numbers 4 – 8 in the SEC was not only higher than 4 – 8 in the BIG XII, but also had bigger endowments
Texas should never have been in the BIG XII if it was about academics
by Richard Iwezulu on Jun 19, 2010 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions

by 










